Patents in Animal Biotechnology: Roslin’s experience to date
Dr Harry Griffin
Roslin Institute (Edinburgh)
Roslin
Midlothian EH25 9PS
Scotland UK
Roslin Institute is the leading centre for research on the genetics of farm animals in the UK, with internationally-recognised programmes of research in animal breeding, genome analysis, reproduction, growth and development, poultry science, animal welfare and nutrition. Roslin Institute has also pioneered the development of methods for genetic modification of farm animals. Roslin Institute was formally created on 1 April 1993 from the Edinburgh Research Station of the Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics Research. This in turn was formed by the amalgamation in 1986 of the Agricultural and Food Research Council’s Poultry Research Centre and Animal Breeding Research Organisation.
Roslin Institute has more than 320 staff, visiting scientists and PhD students. It is located close to the village of Roslin about 7 miles south of Edinburgh city centre. The Bio-technology and Biological Sciences Research Council (the BBSRC; the successor of the AFRC) and the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food are the major funders of Roslin’s research, contributing approximately 30 and 45% of its annual turnover of £10M. The remainder comes from a variety of sources, including the EC, the Scottish Office, the Department of Trade and Industry, industry organisations such as the Meat and Livestock Commission and British Poultry Federation and individual companies, particularly in the animal breeding and feed compounding sectors. The Institute’s staff are employees of the BBSRC.
Roslin Institute’s traditional remit has been the improvement of productivity and welfare of farm animals and this continues to be a major focus of our research. In the past, the expectation of sponsoring government departments and the agricultural industry was that the results would be freely available to everyone, usually via the scientific literature. Encouragement of a more ‘entrepreneurial’ attitude in the public sector by successive governments, overall reductions in funding for agricultural research and new opportunities provided by advances in molecular biology have produced some significant changes in our relationships with sponsors and customers. Contracts and collaborations with individual companies have increased and last year we created Rosgen, a specialist genotyping company which has first option on results from the Institute’s farm animal genome programme (i.e. any molecular markers linked to commercially important traits).
Nevertheless the opportunities for major innovation in conventional agriculture are limited and this is reflected in our current portfolio of patent applications: 14 of the patent applications filed by the Roslin Institute are currently active, but only two have their primary application in conventional agriculture. The remaining applications cover techniques for genetic modification of livestock and poultry. In these instances, the immediate applications are in biotechnology and medicine, where commercial rewards are potentially much larger.
This paper will focus on our experience with patent applications covering two inventions: (1) the use of the b-lactoglobulin (BLG) promoter to direct expression of human proteins in the milk of transgenic sheep and cattle (2) the creation of cloned animals by nuclear transfer from cells in culture. One important lesson from our experience is that an appropriate vehicle for exploiting an invention is at least as important as protection of intellectual property.
BLG promoter
Human proteins are needed in large quantities for treatment of a variety of human conditions, including relatively common genetic diseases such as cystic fibrosis and haemophilia. Some of these proteins are already purified from blood, but this is expensive and runs the risk of contamination ( e.g. by AIDS, hepatitis C or nvCJD). Blood supplies are also limited. The idea of producing therapeutic proteins in the milk of transgenic sheep originated in early 1980's from the then Animal Breeding Research Organisation (ABRO). Dr John Clark and his colleagues at ABRO then showed, firstly in mice and then in sheep, that the b-lactoglobulin (BLG) promoter could be used to direct expression of transgenes specifically to the mammary gland. Patent applications to protect their invention were filed in 1986.
Lack of interest from the major pharmaceutical companies prompted ABR0 to seek venture capital to create a new company to exploit its invention. The company now known as PPL Therapeutic was established in 1987 with one employee: it now has over 120 staff and is one of three leading companies in its field. In 1991,PPL produced ‘Tracy’ the first sheep to produce large quantities of a human protein in milk (35 g per litre). In 1996, PPL became a publicly quoted company with an initial valuation of over £110M.
At the time PPL was created, publicly-funded organisations such as the Roslin Institute were not allowed to hold equity in private companies and PPL is wholly independent from the Institute. Scientific collaboration between PPL and the Institute has continued and the Roslin Institute has assigned a total of four patents to PPL: two covering the use of original b-lactoglobulin (BLG) promoter and two covering improvements to transgene expression. US patents covering the use of the BLG promoter and the specific construct were granted in 1994 and for transgenic animals carrying BLG transgenes in 1995. European patents for the BLG promoter and construct, but not for the transgenic animals themselves, were granted in 1997.
The US patents will last until 2011; the European patents until 2007. PPL’s lead product, alpha-I antitrypsin, (AAT) is a protease inhibitor that is a normal component of the lung’s defences against bacteria but one which can be overwhelmed by persistent infection. AAT from PPL’s transgenic flock is now being used in phase II clinical trials to treat children suffering from cystic fibrosis, a condition that afflicts 1/2500 of Caucasians. If clinical trials are successful, AAT is expected to be on the market in 2001 (i.e. some 15 years after the key patents were filed).
Two other companies are producing therapeutic proteins in milk using similar technology. Genzyme Transgenics in the US initially focused on using the whey acidic protein ( WAP) promoter to direct transgene expression to the mammary gland. Pharming in the Netherlands have used casein promoters. This may appear to be simply three companies based on the use of three different milk protein promoters, but the situation is more complex than this. For example, PPL & Genzyme and Pharming & Genzyme have cross licence agreements to each other’s technologies and broad claims in a European patent granted to Genzyme to all casein and milk serum protein promoters are being disputed by Pharming.
Nuclear Transfer
Recent attention at Roslin has focused on Dolly, the first mammal cloned from an adult cell and on the prospects for the cloning of humans. Our reasons for doing the work were to develop better methods for the genetic modification of farm animals and -in the longer term- to provide ways of multiplying elite cattle and pigs in farm animal production. Until recently the only way of producing transgenic farm animals was by a technique called pro-nuclear injection. This involves the introduction of 200-300 copies of the transgene into recently fertilised eggs which are then transferred to surrogate mothers. Only 1-2%of the offspring are transgenic and only a proportion of these express the transgene at commercially interesting levels. Pronuclear injection can also only add genes.
The ability to carry out more sophisticated genetic modification is important to several biomedical applications of genetically modified farm animals. In therapeutic protein production, for example, there is a need for large quantities of human serum albumin for a range of clinical uses, including treatment of burns patients. Annual demand is estimated at 500 tonnes, which at a cost of $3 a gram translates into a world market of over $1.5 billion a year. Cow’s milk already contains a similar albumin and simply adding the human gene to transgenic cows would require an expensive purification step to separate the two proteins. The more radical solution would be to replace the gene coding for the cow’s albumin with the human serum albumin gene. More sophisticated genetic modifications are needed in xenotransplantation. There is a large shortfall in the availability of human organs for transplant to human in all countries and genetically-modified pigs are being developed as an alternative source of organs. At present it is only possible - by pronuclear injection - to add genes to pigs and the ability to also remove genes would greatly improve the chances of preventing immune rejection.
Experience with bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells has shown that very precise genetic modifications can be introduced into cells in culture, including the removal or replacement of specific genes or the introduction of the single base pair changes into the whole of the genetic code that are typical of many human genetic diseases. In mice, the availability of embryo stem cells has allowed genetically modified mice to be derived from genetically modified cells. To date, however, no group has isolated embryo stem cells in livestock.
Nuclear transfer provides an alternative approach. The technique involves the fusion of individual cells with unfertilised eggs from which the genetic material has been removed. The ‘reconstructed eggs’ are activated by a low voltage electric pulse and then implanted in surrogate mothers. Cloned sheep and cattle were produced in the 1980's by nuclear transfer of cells directly from early embryos, but for nuclear transfer to be used for genetic modification, it has to be successful with cells that have been cultured for extended periods in the laboratory.
The major technical breakthrough in our nuclear transfer research was made by Ian Wilmut, Keith Campbell and their colleagues in 1995 with the production of live lambs - Megan and Morag - from an established cell line. This success followed the use of serum starvation to induce quiescence and patents were filed by Roslin Institute to protect their invention in August 1995. Subsequent work produced lambs from other embryo-derived cells, from foetal cells and - in collaboration with PPL Therapeutics - one lamb (Dolly) from an adult cell. Roslin Institute and PPL subsequently announced the production of the first transgenic lambs by nuclear transfer. In December 1997, the editors of the prestigious US journal ‘Science’ voted Dolly ‘Science breakthrough of the Year’ ahead of NASA’s Mars pathfinder mission and advances in cyclotron design.
The patent applications filed by Roslin Institute on August 1995 are described in PCT/GB96/02098 and PCT/GB96/02099. Patents will be jointly owned by the Roslin Institute, the BBSRC and MAFF and are unlikely to be issued for at least 3-4 years. In the meantime, Roslin Institute has been moving as quickly as possible to capitalise on its invention. In considering commercial opportunities, we have separated the possible applications by field of use and then, within each field, considered the relative merits of licensing, joint ventures or the creation of a new company.
The Institute has concluded a licence agreement with PPL Therapeutics that will cover two specific fields:(1) the production of human therapeutic proteins in the milk of livestock ruminants and rabbits (2) the modification of milk composition for nutraceutical applications such as infant formula milk.
All other biomedical applications of genetic modification of livestock, including xenotransplantation are covered by a licence to Roslin Bio-Med, a new company formed by Roslin Institute in collaboration with venture capitalists 3i. The chairman of Roslin Bio-Med is Ian Kent, formerly of Dalgety and Imutran and its chief executive officer is Simon Best, formerly of Zeneca Plant Science. 3i will be providing a £6M investment over the first three years. One main advantage of the creation of a company over a simple licencing agreement is that it ensures the continuing involvement of the Institute’s existing research team, but the Institute also retains 42% of the equity and has been able to bring in management with the experience and skills to ensure commercial as well as scientific success.
Conclusions
Timely filing for patent protection is essential for protecting the commercial value of inventions but our experience over the past 10 years has shown that an appropriate vehicle for taking the initial invention to commercial reality is equally important. If a suitable commercial partner does not already exist, it may be necessary to create one. Moreover, given the time taken to grant patents, the main use of the patent application is to convince potential investors that their investment will be worthwhile.
Dr Harry Griffin B.Sc., MBA, Ph.D is Assistant Director (Science) at the Roslin Institute. He can be contacted by tel:<44>(0)131-5274478 or Fax:<44>(0)131 4400434 or by E-mail harry.griffin@bbsrc.ac.uk. Further details about Roslin Institute can be obtained from our web site on www.ri.bbsrc.ac.uk.
Back Contents Next

 

Back to top

Back to Current_European Topics